Archives

February 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
Categories: Lost WindsorWindsor

St. Rose and Riverside Dr. Then and Now

Back in 2002 I took this photo of the house at Riverside and St. Rose. It was one of the old French farmhouses, predating nearly everything on the east side. While it had been altered and added on to over the last 125-150 years it was easy to see the humble origins of the past…

Preserve the past? Not when there’s McMansions to build! At least it looks like the trees survived.

Andrew

View Comments

  • Honestly, I like the McMansion better. It's not an eyesore; it's a nice, classy building. It captures a lot of classical looking elements and quality building materials unlike the ghetto suburban crap in South Windsor. It has a stone facade, not vinyl or stucco and glass. You have the Greco-Roman columns and portico on the front and side entrances. Several chimneys which give it a classical look. Different gables and peaks which give it variety, yet there's symmetry in the front entrance which almost give it a French Chateau look. Double hung windows instead of an uncut commercial looking window follow the style from a century ago. The metal roof reminds me of slate. It almost looks like a wrap around driveway in the front. This building seems consistent as an extension of the intent of Riverside Drive as millionaire's row as part of Windsor's roaring 20s post-industrial past and I'm sure there were small farmhouses that were demo'd to build those mansions. It's too bad it doesn't have more land surrounding it though because it looks a little cramped on that lot. But, I'd rather have this building than one of those horrid looking high rises that a lot of those mansions that were part of millionaire's row fell victim to. By building classical looking mansions along Riverside Drive which was millionaire's row for over a century, you've got no complaints from me.

    Also, who knows what the condition of the 150 year old French house was from the inside. I'm guessing a small farmhouse that old would have had a lot of problems with it that may not have been readily noticeable from the exterior photo. The modern looking mods on the farmhouse took away from its charm anyway.

  • I like this house too. It's way too big for the lot, but at least it's not another cookie-cutter raised ranch eyesore. Just think about the house that replaced the "cat house" on Windermere!

  • I don't think its fair to rip on that house... It may not match the farmhouses that were originally there, but at least it looks classy. It certainly is not one of those cookie-cutter subdivision houses that highlight a garage in the front. (or worse yet, the ugly "raised ranch" that seems to be in higher percentage here than any other city). Those old houses do not have the interior for today's lifestyle. And if Riverside Dr. is going to modernize, at least it is being done in a decent way. This house is nice, and I think it makes the trip down Riverside Dr. look classy and rich, as it is known for.

  • It isn't a bad looking house but it certainly doesn't fit the footprint of the land very well.
    But I understand your sentiment. We remove yet more history for just another mcmansion which could have been built anywhere.

  • Fair enough, my biggest problem is that it looks crammed on the lot.

    It looks like a marshmallow crammed in a coin slot. It's way too big of a house for the lot.

  • I think style is a pretty personal thing. I was surprised that others like this house, personally I find the whole effect a little odd. To me, this super-large house, jammed on the small lot looks odd. I'm not a fan of this architectural style - but again, that's my tastes.

    To me, the effect of this house is as jarring as the one on Windermere......but that's just my opinion.

    The old house did stay vacant, I think, for a long time and maybe was beyond saving. There is a similar situation on the other corner - that house also replaced a much older house that had fallen on hard times.

  • I think it's a nice looking house...if it wasn't crammed onto a corner lot beside other smaller houses. The three car garage alone looks gigantic compared to other houses around it. At least this house isn't the same cookie cutter design from a subdivision.

  • It seems to me that the McMansion in all of it's monstrosity couldn't leave room for a sidewalk that was originally there.

  • Shawn the sidewalk could still be there the two pictures are shot at different angles. I think it's a very nice house and very smart on how they maximized the use of the property for interior living space after all that's where most of the time is spent.

Recent Posts

2177 Victoria Avenue

Built in 1929, the house at 2177 Victoria Avenue was originally numbered 1545 Victoria, pre…

1 week ago

Crescent Lanes – 871 Ottawa

Crescent Lanes first opened on Ottawa Street in 1944 at 1055 Ottawa Street, opposite Lanspeary…

2 months ago

1156 Ouellette – Oswald Janisse House

Above is a photo of the home of Mr & Mrs Oswald Janisse, located at…

4 months ago

White’s Restaurant & The Elbow Room – 33 Pitt Street East

in 1917 two Greek brothers Gus & Harry Lukos purchased a one story building on…

5 months ago

4219 Wyandotte Street East

Photo from Google Streetview A long time reader sent me an email the other week…

6 months ago

841 Ouellette – Final Days

An unremarkable end to a part of Windsor's history. The large vacant house at 841…

7 months ago