Archives

November 2008
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Categories: Photo Du JourWindsor

Chrysler HQ Flashback

Going though some old photos, I came across these photos of the Chrysler Headquarters under construction. I posted these photos, once a long time ago. But I couldn’t find them on the site, so they may have been on the old version of the site.

May 6, 2001 – The site has been cleared and the crane is in place on the site of Windsor’s biggest mistake.

January 9, 2002 – Looking north on Ouellette towards the river.

January 9, 2002 – Looking at the corner of Ouellette and Chatham.

Andrew

View Comments

  • Of course hindsight is 20/20 but it was just a stupid decision to move in the first place. The old HQ was just fine right across from the plant although a bit dated. The building was solid, had historic roots and was right where it should have been. They didn't need an overpriced tower on the river to house everyone (I think they've cut about 30-40% of the original staff since that opened downtown) as they also have another office on Temple drive. I remember the many times I was in the old HQ and although just an office building, it still had character. Just as many other spots in Windsor, it became a park and most recently...yep, a parking lot!

  • Agreed Colin - the old HQ on Chrysler Centre had serious style, great looking building--even liked the old C H R Y S L E R lettering.

    Interesting to look back at construction...sadly the building was far less than it could've been--I'm not sure was worth sacrificing the Norwich Block for. I'm amazed at how much better it looked before it was finished--strangely enough it looked way better without its aluminum siding.

    Can still remember walking out of the soon-to-disappear Royal Bank at Ouellette and Pitt and seeing the wrecking ball wailing away at the old coffee house on the opposite corner.

  • Andrew, you should have shown what was there before for our out of town guests.

    Hurst as a mayor was bad and this big blunder made it worse. Heck Even Eddie hasn't done anything this dumb. But he is trying with his stupid canal idea.

    You know, it never ceases to amaze what elected people do with public money. Why on earth would anyone tear down a block of businesses in order to build a 14 story building that had only one tenant that filled 1/3 of the building? It is mind boggling to say the least.

    By the way the building was "supposed" to be somewhere between 32-37 stories originally but it was scaled back because there were no tenants. That in itself should have gave the warning signs. That is why we need councillors with backbones because when they just go along with the ride, crap like this happens.

  • I heard that they made the foundation solid and large enough that another dozen stories could be added to the top of it if there was a market demand. Any truth to that?

    Reading the paper earlier this week. Chrysler is looking to move completely out of that building due to cuts. Mikhail holdings was offering a fraction of what it cost to build it if it's looking to be sold--something in the range of $8m with attached parking garage. What did it cost taxpayers to build it (with all the settlements) btw?

  • I also remember reading that the building was designed to support another ten to fifteen floors but that market demand was too soft. I remember Mike Hurst telling the Star that once the Chrysler building was up, developers would be stampeding to put up even more office buildings downtown. He told everybody that Windsor would soon turn into a "mini-Chicago" and that the cost of the new building would pay for itself over time.

  • If I recall correctly, when they downsized the building, they put in I think what they called a floating foundation which is basically a very thick concrete slab. They decided that driving piles down to the bedrock was not necessary since the building was not going to be that high. So I think that they are very limited in adding more floors.
    Regardless of its height, what was lost on that block can never be replaced.

  • The only thing wrong with the Canderel is that it won't burn as easily as the Plywood Palace did, it should have never been built there.

    And I guess we will find out this morning in the Renaissance Center will be for sale soon and if there is anything left of GM, Ford or Chrysler.

  • Truly a monument to mediocrity. Perhaps the most alligorical building in all of Windsor, which to me captures a time in our recent history when most people viewed tearing down well-crafted buildings that have stood for over a century as "progress" and vacant consumerism. Its like a statue of someone wearing bell-bottoms: new and edgy for its time, but quickly old fashioned and campy.

  • i have a couple photos of the lot before anything was put on it after norwich was torn down. i'll post them on my flickr.

Share
Published by
Andrew

Recent Posts

Crescent Lanes – 871 Ottawa

Crescent Lanes first opened on Ottawa Street in 1944 at 1055 Ottawa Street, opposite Lanspeary…

2 months ago

1156 Ouellette – Oswald Janisse House

Above is a photo of the home of Mr & Mrs Oswald Janisse, located at…

3 months ago

White’s Restaurant & The Elbow Room – 33 Pitt Street East

in 1917 two Greek brothers Gus & Harry Lukos purchased a one story building on…

4 months ago

4219 Wyandotte Street East

Photo from Google Streetview A long time reader sent me an email the other week…

6 months ago

841 Ouellette – Final Days

An unremarkable end to a part of Windsor's history. The large vacant house at 841…

6 months ago

Joseph L. Reaume House – 1924

One for the lost Windsor files, is this house that once belonged to Joseph Reaume…

7 months ago