And another one gone, and another one gone…

View Comments

• Now let's keep in mind there is no proof there is asbestos in the building. Most century old buildings don't have it in the initial structure, it would have been added in during subsequent renovation, etc...

  While it might be in there, it also might not be...

  Sounds like there is a good rain storm brewing too... I'm sure if there is anything bad in the debris, it's got an afternoon date with the storm sewers...

• The media has been great, agreed, and I am eternally grateful to them and to Chris Holt for getting them on board, but I am also a bit disappointed with many of the comments I've read on the Windsor Star web site indicating public support is not all we hoped it would be. Some calling us "crybabies" making a big deal over a "dilapidated building". If you want to know why it's so hard to ingrain an appreciation for our heritage in Windsor, there's the reason .... a prevailing throwaway attitude among Windsorites toward our heritage buildings. One guy even even said if he had his way they'd bulldoze the Martin house. We are vocal, but I'm afraid we are a vocal minority. Still a long road ahead....

• John, I've seen those same comments and wrote a reply which may or may not get posted by the star. I think the issue is that people don't seem to realize that the building became "dilapidated" while under the ownership of Asscock Sood. I got the impression that people thought he had bought the property and this crumby old building had magically appeared on it, leaving him no choice but to rip it down to restore his property to its former glory. It wasn't his fault that the building was deteriorating. I'm sure these people will sing a different tune when they have a vast array of empty lots to shop at, go to for a quick bite, or meet a friend for a drink. Oh wait, you can't do that on an empty lot! Unfortunately, the type of people who are leaving those messages will not realize that until it's too late and we only have Walmart as an option and no one can afford to drive out to the middle of nowhere to shop at the Walmart.

• Greg Heil needs to use a bit of stronger stance other than "city hall dropped the ball" and "this is a shame". Why isn't he holding the planning department accountable and demanding answers NOW?!
  No wonder our heritage is lost. Where is his outrage? Is it because funding for the Heritage come from city hall and he doesn't want to rock the boat? STAND UP FOR WINDSOR!

• Dave - I sit on that board, and trust me Greg Heil isn't the problem. If it wasn't for his leadership, the heritage committee wouldn;t have accomplished half of what it has. He has demanded answers, the day it occured, although I suspect that we won't get too many answers. There is a culture of secrecy at City Hall, and I'm not expect the lowly heritage committee to get an answer from the politbureau.

  Your acustations are just plain wrong and terribly insulting to someone who has volunteered (the WHC is not paid) his time for decade toward standing up for and protecting Windsor's heritage. Poining fingers at the WHC and its chair is an insult to me as a board member and certainly will not accomplish anything but to weaken the state of heritage in this city, which I believe is the true intention of this administration. Wait until November when myself and Greg leave the WHC, and see how much is preserved, and how little will happen from that point forward.

  Seems like maybe you're spending too much time over at Chris Schnurr's site...

  As far as rocking the boat goes, Greg is a first class boat rocker. Don't worry.

• As an extra Dave - The role of the WHC is stricty as an advisory body to city council.

  We are not automomous.

  Our mandate is as follows:

  The WHC advises City Council on the identification, recognition, protection, enhancement and proper management of heritage resources in the City of Windsor.

  The group that isn't tied to city hall is the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario.

• I expected stronger language than Mr. Heil's especially because this isn't the first time it happened. Reading the paper it seemed as if he was nonchalant about it.

  I am not sure how me being upset about how Mr. Heil's response to the situation has affected you? You certainly didn't state what Mr. Heil stated and you were there for the vigil so I don't understand how you equate my accusations to personally hurt you?

  If he is as good as you say he is then that is good for Windsor. I just expected a stronger response. I am sure when you two leave Windsor will be for the worse as I know how much you do to try and keep what little Windsor has.

  By the way I don't let someone else's ideas control my own. Chris can believe what he thinks as do I.

• I am not sure how me being upset about how Mr. Heil’s response to the situation has affected you?

  As a member of the committee, The Chair is the public spokesman for the committee.

  By you saying:

  Is it because funding for the Heritage come from city hall and he doesn’t want to rock the boat?

  Insinuates that the entire committee keeps quiet and is under the mayor's control. As a member your accusation is also leveled upon me.

  That is how your false accusation affects me.

• City Hall staff can be replaced, the Seagrave Building and others like it cannot.