Archives

June 2012
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Categories: StuccoWindsor

Stucco Time – Guess the Victim

First off sorry for the lack of a post yesterday. I was sick on Monday and actually lost a day somewhere this week.

See if you can guess today’s victim of the great urban blight?

If you guessed the crazy cool streamlined Anderson’s funeral home, you are correct!

In case you forgot, here’s what it looked like when it looked good. Now it looks like every other turd. This has got to go to the top of the list of egregious violations against architecture.

Obviously, whoever ordered this “renovation” doesn’t care, but just so he/she knows. It looks like shit now. Congratulations.

Andrew

View Comments

  • Wow. Since early 1952, three of my family were buried from Andersons.
    A buddy worked there and was proud of the structure and his profession.
    And... wasn't it a three-storey building?

  • Umm, I'm not a fan of stucco on brick or limestone, but I thought it was a stucco facade prior to the renovations. If it was stucco, it has to be redone after so many years. You either have to take off the old stucco or secure to old facade with some base like styrofoam and put a new coat on. Did anyone actually see them cover up the green tile? Are you 100% positive they are not going to put the historic elements back up? Did anyone bother to ask anyone inside first? Stucco doesn't last an eternity like limestone or marble. A lot of slander and very little facts presented.

  • To even call it stucco is wrong. It's styrofoam and spackle and some kind of spray stuff. And then they get the yobs who are doing it to cut up different geometric shapes and they plop it onto the surface as if it's some kind of architectural detail. Check out the boxes they are putting at the base of the supports that hold up the car port portion of the building.

    When is the city ever going to wise up and stop this crap from happening? It is infuriating. I cannot say that I am aware of any other city that does this.

    I think there is one company that must be responsible for convincing building owners to do this. It's misguided and ugly. It reminds of the 90s when shop owners were convinced by some lame assed awning company to replace their old, "unsightly" neon signs in favour of those vinyl lettered, illuminated awnings. You know, replace a neon sign that is still functioning or maybe needs a little face lift and that has been around for 50 years, with a nice, new vinyl lettered awning - that may last about 5 years before the letters start to curl up and shrink and peel off... Does anybody remember the first Pat and Hanks Fish and Chips sign with the fish wearing a top hat? In neon... so amazing....

  • Can anyone offer a history of ownership for this business? I am interested in the legacy of local, family owned facilities and their heritage. I know this facility has been in Windsor for years.Is it still family owned ?

  • Don't hold back Chris! I agree with you 100%. Old style stucco is actually quite elegant and durable. I manage a historically designated stucco clad home built out of ceramic block and stucco which has requiored very minimal exterior maintenance for the past 50 years! As to the new "stucco" - give it a good boot and see what happens!

  • in the past twenty five years their has been a buyout of local funeral homes, large groups have taken over many family buisness. I am not sure whitch local ones are still localy owned.

  • Windsor Chapel Funeral Home and Families First are, to the best of my knowledge, two of the last independently/family owned funeral parlours.

  • i had a look at it yesterday the guy who was the boss of the stucco people was talking to the manager out front on the sidewalk part of it on the parking lot side is finished it is a dark gray/green with black trim it actually looks half as decent

  • From what I saw, and I could be way off.. But the side of the building already had the 2 tone stucco job... light brown base with darker accents... I would imagine that (and I could be wrong) that they intend to carry this scheme into the front of the building. So I'm not convinced that they are simply maintaining the stucco and intend to return it to the existing style and colour scheme. From what I see it looks like the owners see all the other homes around the area (like the families first stucco palaces) and are trying to "modernize" their facade to "keep up with the joneses". I truly hope this is not the case, and as another writer wrote they are simply maintaining the existing stucco with a new coat.

Share
Published by
Andrew

Recent Posts

2177 Victoria Avenue

Built in 1929, the house at 2177 Victoria Avenue was originally numbered 1545 Victoria, pre…

1 week ago

Crescent Lanes – 871 Ottawa

Crescent Lanes first opened on Ottawa Street in 1944 at 1055 Ottawa Street, opposite Lanspeary…

2 months ago

1156 Ouellette – Oswald Janisse House

Above is a photo of the home of Mr & Mrs Oswald Janisse, located at…

4 months ago

White’s Restaurant & The Elbow Room – 33 Pitt Street East

in 1917 two Greek brothers Gus & Harry Lukos purchased a one story building on…

5 months ago

4219 Wyandotte Street East

Photo from Google Streetview A long time reader sent me an email the other week…

6 months ago

841 Ouellette – Final Days

An unremarkable end to a part of Windsor's history. The large vacant house at 841…

7 months ago